Report created on Sat Jul 26 13:13:10 2014. back to main menu

NOTE: as of 20140601, GNATS has been deprecated. Until portsmon can catch up, expect the PR data to be stale.

Enter a new maintainer (partial match is OK) to get information about their FreeBSD ports:

Maintainer: 

For explanatory information and summary details, see the notes below.

portname maintainer build error logs Problem Reports Responsible
databases/ldb timur@FreeBSD.org      
databases/ntdb timur@FreeBSD.org      
databases/tdb timur@FreeBSD.org   176758: [patch] databases/tdb: samba talloc + tdb incorrect w/ non-default LOCALBASE timur
187981: databases/tdb 1.2.12,1 make package fails timur
devel/p5-Parse-Pidl timur@FreeBSD.org      
devel/talloc timur@FreeBSD.org   187979: devel/talloc 2.1.0 make package fails timur
devel/tevent timur@FreeBSD.org      
dns/samba-nsupdate timur@FreeBSD.org   181696: port dns/samba-nsupdate doesn't link -lgssapi_krb5, won't compile on base krb5 timur
net/samba-libsmbclient timur@FreeBSD.org      
net/samba-nmblookup timur@FreeBSD.org      
net/samba-smbclient timur@FreeBSD.org      
net/samba36 timur@FreeBSD.org   164010: [patch] net/samba36: Split up samba scripts into more manageable pieces timur
169598: net/samba36: winbind failure on ssh login, failed to mlock memory: Cannot allocate memory (12) timur
172983: Upgrade from net/samba36 3.6.7 to 3.6.8 kills AD membership, "net ads join" segfaults timur
177786: net/samba36 net/samba-nmblookup multimedia/xbmc conflics timur
186287: net/samba36: looping detected inside krb5_get_in_tkt on 10.0-RELEASE timur
net/samba4 timur@FreeBSD.org install_error 180226: net/samba4 port rc script syntax errors ("samba" vs "smbd") timur
180983: net/samba4 fails to build timur
183285: ports net/samba4 4.0.8 fails to build. Linking error timur
183872: net/samba4 does not need to pull in lang/gcc timur
183885: net/samba4: use net/mDNSResponder to provide Zeroconf support timur
net/samba41 timur@FreeBSD.org cluster 186575: net/samba41: Start of Samba results in "nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server" errors timur
190166: net/samba41 rc script doesn't follow custom smb.conf timur
ports shown: 13   ports with build errors: 2 ports with outstanding PRs: 6  
ports with either build errors or PRs: 6

Notes:

Clicking on each column heading will cause the report to be redone sorted by that column. Clicking again will reverse the sort.

The portname column includes links to a more complete overview for that port.

The maintainer column includes links to a page showing the status of all ports for that maintainer.

The build error logs column represents the list of unique errors noticed in any build environment (if any). The errors are listed alphabetically. Each entry is a link to a particular errorlog. (In cases where the same error occurs in multiple build environments, the latest errorlog is used.)

The list of build errors that are detected, and a short description of each one, can be found here.

The PRs (if any) for the given port are listed numerically in the Problem Reports column. Thus, for each port, they should also be in order from earliest to latest.

Currently, no effort is made to correlate any individual build error with any individual PR. They are listed in adjacent columns only for your viewing convenience.

The underlying technology of this report relies on trying to extract information from the existing GNATS database entries. These entries are entered by human users using the send-pr command. As such, the quality of the entries varies greatly.

The fastest, and easiest, information is gleaned from a GNATS entry whose subject line contains the port category and port name, separated by a slash. However, if this algorithm only flagged those, it would miss nearly 50% of the ports PRs, not to mention all the 'framework' PRs.

So, as an extension, various heuristics are used to guess what it is the user really intended. See the code in gnatsQueryUtils.py for the gory details. What's important to understand is this: there is no possible algorithm that will correctly identify all the ambiguous PRs without getting a few false identifications and still run in less than geological time. So, before you are tempted to file a PR on this algorithm itself, read the code to understand its design tradeoffs, and then consider instead filing followup PRs to the ambiguous PRs that would disambiguate them instead. Thanks -- the author.