Report created on Thu Nov 27 04:18:57 2014. back to main menu

NOTE: as of 20140601, GNATS has been deprecated. Until portsmon can catch up, expect the PR data to be stale.

Enter a new maintainer (partial match is OK) to get information about their FreeBSD ports:

Maintainer: 

For explanatory information and summary details, see the notes below.

 
portname maintainer build error logs
audio/py-mpd2 rene@FreeBSD.org  
comms/dcf77pi rene@FreeBSD.org  
emulators/fuse rene@FreeBSD.org  
emulators/fuse-utils rene@FreeBSD.org  
emulators/libspectrum rene@FreeBSD.org  
games/torcs rene@FreeBSD.org  
lang/bas2tap rene@FreeBSD.org  
lang/bf2c rene@FreeBSD.org  
lang/nbc rene@FreeBSD.org  
misc/biosfont-demos rene@FreeBSD.org  
multimedia/spotify-websocket-api rene@FreeBSD.org  
sysutils/biosfont [I] rene@FreeBSD.org  
textproc/gutenmark rene@FreeBSD.org  
www/py-ws4py rene@FreeBSD.org  
ports shown: 14 ports with build errors: 0

Notes:

Clicking on each column heading will cause the report to be redone sorted by that column. Clicking again will reverse the sort.

The portname column includes links to a more complete overview for that port.

The maintainer column includes links to a page showing the status of all ports for that maintainer.

The build error logs column represents the list of unique errors noticed in any build environment (if any). The errors are listed alphabetically. Each entry is a link to a particular errorlog. (In cases where the same error occurs in multiple build environments, the latest errorlog is used.)

The list of build errors that are detected, and a short description of each one, can be found here.

The PRs (if any) for the given port are listed numerically in the Problem Reports column. Thus, for each port, they should also be in order from earliest to latest.

Currently, no effort is made to correlate any individual build error with any individual PR. They are listed in adjacent columns only for your viewing convenience.

The underlying technology of this report relies on trying to extract information from the existing GNATS database entries. These entries are entered by human users using the send-pr command. As such, the quality of the entries varies greatly.

The fastest, and easiest, information is gleaned from a GNATS entry whose subject line contains the port category and port name, separated by a slash. However, if this algorithm only flagged those, it would miss nearly 50% of the ports PRs, not to mention all the 'framework' PRs.

So, as an extension, various heuristics are used to guess what it is the user really intended. See the code in gnatsQueryUtils.py for the gory details. What's important to understand is this: there is no possible algorithm that will correctly identify all the ambiguous PRs without getting a few false identifications and still run in less than geological time. So, before you are tempted to file a PR on this algorithm itself, read the code to understand its design tradeoffs, and then consider instead filing followup PRs to the ambiguous PRs that would disambiguate them instead. Thanks -- the author.