Report created on Mon Jun 26 07:06:53 2017. back to main menu


Enter a new maintainer (partial match is OK) to get information about their FreeBSD ports:

Maintainer: 

For explanatory information and summary details, see the notes below.

portname maintainer build error logs Problem Reports Responsible
audio/freealut oliver@FreeBSD.org      
benchmarks/hpl oliver@FreeBSD.org      
databases/courier-authlib-mysql oliver@FreeBSD.org      
databases/courier-authlib-pgsql oliver@FreeBSD.org      
databases/courier-authlib-userdb oliver@FreeBSD.org      
databases/courier-authlib-usergdbm oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/atlas oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/atlas-devel oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/eris oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/libmowgli oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/libwfut oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/libzvbi oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/mercator oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/pecl-yac oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/physfs oliver@FreeBSD.org      
devel/physfs-devel oliver@FreeBSD.org ???    
devel/varconf oliver@FreeBSD.org      
ftp/gftp oliver@FreeBSD.org      
games/dmjava oliver@FreeBSD.org      
games/ember [B] oliver@FreeBSD.org      
games/heretic oliver@FreeBSD.org      
graphics/cegui oliver@FreeBSD.org      
graphics/ogre3d oliver@FreeBSD.org      
graphics/sage oliver@FreeBSD.org      
irc/muh oliver@FreeBSD.org      
mail/courier-authlib-vchkpw oliver@FreeBSD.org      
mail/courier-imap oliver@FreeBSD.org      
mail/greylite oliver@FreeBSD.org      
mail/qmail-conf oliver@FreeBSD.org      
mail/sqwebmail oliver@FreeBSD.org      
mail/vqadmin oliver@FreeBSD.org      
math/wfmath oliver@FreeBSD.org      
misc/mime-support oliver@FreeBSD.org      
multimedia/xawtv oliver@FreeBSD.org      
net/courier-authlib-ldap oliver@FreeBSD.org      
net/skstream oliver@FreeBSD.org      
security/courier-authlib oliver@FreeBSD.org      
security/courier-authlib-base oliver@FreeBSD.org      
security/oidentd oliver@FreeBSD.org      
sysutils/xcdroast oliver@FreeBSD.org      
x11-fonts/tv-fonts oliver@FreeBSD.org      
ports shown: 41   ports with build errors: 1 ports with outstanding PRs: 0  
ports with either build errors or PRs: 1

Notes:

Clicking on each column heading will cause the report to be redone sorted by that column. Clicking again will reverse the sort.

The portname column includes links to a more complete overview for that port.

The maintainer column includes links to a page showing the status of all ports for that maintainer.

The build error logs column represents the list of unique errors noticed in any build environment (if any). The errors are listed alphabetically. Each entry is a link to a particular errorlog. (In cases where the same error occurs in multiple build environments, the latest errorlog is used.)

The list of build errors that are detected, and a short description of each one, can be found here.

The PRs (if any) for the given port are listed numerically in the Problem Reports column. Thus, for each port, they should also be in order from earliest to latest.

Currently, no effort is made to correlate any individual build error with any individual PR. They are listed in adjacent columns only for your viewing convenience.

The underlying technology of this report relies on trying to extract information from the existing PR database entries. These entries are entered by human users using the send-pr command. As such, the quality of the entries varies greatly.

The fastest, and easiest, information is gleaned from a PR entry whose subject line contains the port category and port name, separated by a slash. However, if this algorithm only flagged those, it would miss nearly 50% of the ports PRs, not to mention all the 'framework' PRs.

So, as an extension, various heuristics are used to guess what it is the user really intended. See the code in prQueryUtils.py for the gory details. What's important to understand is this: there is no possible algorithm that will correctly identify all the ambiguous PRs without getting a few false identifications and still run in less than geological time. So, before you are tempted to file a PR on this algorithm itself, read the code to understand its design tradeoffs, and then consider instead filing followup PRs to the ambiguous PRs that would disambiguate them instead. Thanks -- the author.