Report created on Wed Mar 29 20:53:17 2017. back to main menu

Enter a new build error (partial match is ok) to get information about FreeBSD ports with that error:

Build error: 

For explanatory information and summary details, see the notes below.

portname maintainer build error logs Problem Reports Responsible
archivers/arj coredump    
audio/kid3-qt4 ???
audio/qmpdclient coredump    
biology/plinkseq bad_C++_code
databases/akonadi coredump    
databases/sqlitebrowser ???
devel/godot coredump    
devel/godot-tools coredump    
devel/ice ???
devel/msp430-debug-stack coredump    
devel/rubygem-glib2 coredump    
devel/shiboken coredump    
emulators/aqemu ???
emulators/ppsspp-qt4 coredump    
emulators/qtemu coredump    
games/chessx coredump    
games/gnuchess coredump    
games/hyperrogue ???
games/openglad coredump    
games/tbe coredump    
graphics/OpenEXR ???
graphics/djview4-qt4 coredump    
graphics/gnofract4d coredump    
graphics/qcomicbook ???
irc/undernet-ircu coredump
lang/dmd2 coredump
lang/hugs coredump    
lang/libjit (unknown) clang
lang/scm ???
mail/cone coredump
math/PDL coredump    
misc/freebsd-doc-el coredump    
misc/freebsd-doc-en coredump    
misc/freebsd-doc-hu coredump    
misc/freebsd-doc-it coredump    
misc/freebsd-doc-mn coredump    
misc/freebsd-doc-nl coredump    
misc/freebsd-doc-pl coredump    
misc/freebsd-doc-ru coredump    
misc/freebsd-doc-zh_cn coredump    
multimedia/dvbcut coredump    
multimedia/kvazaar coredump    
multimedia/umplayer coredump    
net-im/licq-qt-gui ???
net-p2p/bitcoin coredump    
net-p2p/eiskaltdcpp-qt ???
net-p2p/litecoin coredump    
net-p2p/valknut coredump    
net/cagibi ???
net/x2goclient coredump    
news/nntpcache coredump    
print/qpdfview coredump    
science/libint coredump    
security/clambc configure_error
security/keepassx2 ???
security/qtkeychain-qt4 coredump    
sysutils/policykit-qt coredump    
sysutils/qpxtool coredump    
www/anyterm coredump
x11-fonts/fontmatrix coredump    
x11-wm/e-module-alarm coredump    
x11/qxkb ???
x11/xgrab coredump
ports shown: 63   ports with build errors: 63 ports with outstanding PRs: 0  
ports with either build errors or PRs: 63


Clicking on each column heading will cause the report to be redone sorted by that column. Clicking again will reverse the sort.

The portname column includes links to a more complete overview for that port.

The maintainer column includes links to a page showing the status of all ports for that maintainer.

The build error logs column represents the list of unique errors noticed in any build environment (if any). The errors are listed alphabetically. Each entry is a link to a particular errorlog. (In cases where the same error occurs in multiple build environments, the latest errorlog is used.)

The list of build errors that are detected, and a short description of each one, can be found here.

The PRs (if any) for the given port are listed numerically in the Problem Reports column. Thus, for each port, they should also be in order from earliest to latest.

Currently, no effort is made to correlate any individual build error with any individual PR. They are listed in adjacent columns only for your viewing convenience.

The underlying technology of this report relies on trying to extract information from the existing PR database entries. These entries are entered by human users using the send-pr command. As such, the quality of the entries varies greatly.

The fastest, and easiest, information is gleaned from a PR entry whose subject line contains the port category and port name, separated by a slash. However, if this algorithm only flagged those, it would miss nearly 50% of the ports PRs, not to mention all the 'framework' PRs.

So, as an extension, various heuristics are used to guess what it is the user really intended. See the code in for the gory details. What's important to understand is this: there is no possible algorithm that will correctly identify all the ambiguous PRs without getting a few false identifications and still run in less than geological time. So, before you are tempted to file a PR on this algorithm itself, read the code to understand its design tradeoffs, and then consider instead filing followup PRs to the ambiguous PRs that would disambiguate them instead. Thanks -- the author.